Boom Time for US Billionaires: How the System Perpetuates Wealth Inequality
Among countless Americans, the economic climate over the recent five-year span has been difficult. Costs have soared while salaries remains unchanged. High mortgage rates have made buying a home a dismal prospect. The rate of unemployment has been gradually increasing.
Most people have indicated they're putting off major life decisions, including raising children or switching jobs, because of economic uncertainty. But for a select few of people, the last five years couldn't have been any better.
Fortune Expansion
The wealth of the world's billionaires increased 54% in 2020, at the climax of the pandemic. And even during all the market volatility, the stock market has only kept rising. This growth has largely benefited just a tiny percentage of Americans: 10% of the population owns 93% of stock market wealth.
However unequal as this division seems, it's the economic framework working as it is presently configured.
"Rich elites have bought their jets, they've bought their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're buying senators and media outlets," commented economic inequality analyst Chuck Collins. "We're now stepping into this other chapter of extreme wealth extraction where the wealthy are taking advantage of the system of inequality."
Understanding Wealth Tiers
To help others understand what exactly it means to be "affluent" in the US, Collins borrows a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, imagined the different levels of wealth as "Wealthville" villages: Prosperity Village, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.
To update the concept, Collins organizes these "wealth villages" based on income levels:
- At the lowest tier, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a annual salary of at least $110,000 and an net worth of over $1.5m.
- The villages get more select as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
- Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
- Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.
Collectively, the residents of these villages constitute the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their lifestyles vary dramatically.
"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still sitting in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins noted. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're traveling via a private jet. That's a really separate reality. You fly private, you have no stakes in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system collapses – you're set."
Extreme Affluence Consequences
The highest hill in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's richest. The influence that this group has greatly exceeds those who are simply well-off, let alone the ordinary person who doesn't reside in "Richistan" at all.
But Collins thinks the activist mantra "billionaires shouldn't exist" misses the point and has a "suggestion of eradication" to it.
"It's the difference between private conduct and a framework of policies," Collins explained. "We should be worried about an economic system that channels so much wealth upward to the billionaires."
Wealth Accumulation Mechanisms
To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins separates it into four parts: getting the wealth, protecting assets, political capture and hyper-extraction.
When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think only about the first step, Collins said. People can create a limited sum of wealth through creating or operating a successful business, which could get them residency in Affluent Town.
But getting to Billionaireville requires serious investment and planning in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "wealth defense industry": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their skills to ensure that the super rich are being deliberate about their taxes.
"Wealth defense professionals use a wide variety of tools such as trusts, international accounts, anonymous shell companies, charitable foundations and other vehicles to hold assets," he details.
Political Influence and Hyper-Extraction
To further a wealth defense strategy, a family needs policy assistance. Wealth of over $40m converts to political power, Collins says, and can be used to secure fortune and maintain expansion.
The final phase is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "extreme removal" to describe how the wealthy have come to influence nearly every single part of an Americans' everyday life largely through private equity, which allows wealthy individuals to invest in private companies.
"Private equity is looking for those corners of the economy where they can squeeze things a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people realize is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is accumulated in so few hands, and they can basically shift and say, 'Where else can we generate returns out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can increase their costs."
Tangible Effects
The effects of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people facing higher costs for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any significant salary growth. And Collins said the pain and frustration of this kind of society can lead to serious unrest.
"The most powerful affluent rulers understand people are being left behind [and] are monetarily hurting," Collins said, adding that Republicans have been good at connecting with a potent "false common-man appeal".
Policy Situation
The irony, Collins points out in his book, is that elected representatives have appointed a series of billionaires to government roles. Along with affluent innovators who had short yet influential roles overseeing significant decreases to the federal workforce, other crucial appointments for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.
This administrative framework, along with help from legislative supporters, helped pass major tax legislation, which will make permanent tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations.
Potential Changes
While political parties continue to argue that border policies and unfavorable commercial treaties are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the question becomes: Will the opposing party, which has also been controlled by the billionaires and big money, be able to seriously confront the underlying harms?" Collins said.
Liberal leaders, he argues, know what policies are needed to "change wealth distribution", including deep changes to the tax system, boosting the minimum wage and supporting labor organizations.
"It was so, so close, and the bill really did represent the will of the bulk of people who really want lawmakers to solve some of these pressing issues," Collins said. "Oligarchic power is not about developing so much as blocking. It's easier to block than it is to make something meaningful happen, but the institutional knowledge is there. We know what that looks like."
Collins is optimistic that there can be change, but said it would require ongoing legislative effort.
"It may be before we know it that the tide turns, and then it really is about sustaining a ongoing grassroots effort to make progress on this profound imbalance we're living in," he said. "We can solve this. It is solvable."