🔗 Share this article

During last year's presidential campaign, the former president wooed the electorate with promises to reduce prices starting on day one. However, after he assumed office, he seemed to pay precious little attention to affordability issues. All that changed following price-fatigued voters expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Within days, his team launched a hastily assembled campaign to tackle living costs. Unfortunately, this initiative is a hot mess—characterized by illogical claims, inconsistencies, unrealistic expectations, scapegoating, and misleading statements.

Out-of-Touch Claims and Supermarket Reality

Just two days post-election, Trump began his affordability drive with a poorly received statement: “Our groceries are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” This comment from billionaire Trump—who frequently mingles with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated a lack of empathy for millions of Americans facing difficulties when visiting supermarkets. Essentially, he ignored their struggles as trivial, implying they were mistaken about actual costs.

This statement about declining prices was highly misleading and inaccurate. How could all costs be falling when the taxes he imposed were pushing up costs? Recent data indicate banana prices increased 6.9% in the last twelve months, beef prices went up 14.7%, and the cost of coffee jumped by nearly 19%—partly because of punitive tariffs on Brazil’s coffee and beef. In the first three quarters, costs increased in the majority of food categories tracked by the government’s price index, such as animal proteins (up 4.5%), drinks (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (rising slightly).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Financial Statements

In spite of the evidence, Trump persists in repeating his misleading narrative about lower costs. Since election day, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “prices are way down,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” These statements ignore the fact that general costs have unarguably risen after the previous administration. At present, inflation is at a 3% annual rate, which is half again as much than the Federal Reserve’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, he boasted that gas prices had dropped to around two dollars, despite official data show they average over three dollars.

Faced with reality and declining opinion polls, advisers evidently warned that his “prices are down” message portrayed him as disconnected from ordinary people. A lot of citizens are angry about prices continuing to climb after assurances of decreases. As a result, advisers proposed one quick fix: roll back certain import taxes. The logical move clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs would not increase costs for American shoppers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Potential Effects

As certain taxes being rolled back on several food items, the administration will probably claim that he has lowered costs once those foods begin to fall in price. This would be like an arsonist taking credit for extinguishing a fire that he ignited. In another instance, when addressing fast-food leaders, Trump stated that “this is the peak period of America” and assured listeners that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” Such statements are easy for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to countless households facing hardships—especially when many face cuts to nutrition assistance or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a recent poll from October, three-quarters of respondents think the state of the economy are fair or poor, while only 26% consider them positive. A separate survey showed that a majority of citizens say Trump’s policies have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Economic Reality and Suggested Steps

Scott Bessent, Trump’s top economic official, recently disputed assertions of a golden age. He noted that far from booming, certain sectors of the American economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—which Trump vowed to save—appears to have contracted for eight months in a row and shed around tens of thousands of positions since January. Citing these challenges, the secretary called on the central bank to cut interest rates—an action that could help affordability.

In response to widespread concern about affordability, Trump proposed a direct payment of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” not for “high income people.” For many struggling Americans, this sounds like a financial lifeline, but it is unlikely that Congress—already alarmed about huge budget deficits—will approve the proposal. The scheme could increase federal spending, increase interest rates, and possibly drive prices higher by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.

A further proposed solution for affordability centered on introducing 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that this would lower housing costs. But, reality is that 50-year mortgages would do little to lower monthly payments—frequently cutting them by just $100 or $200 each month. The drawback is that these loans could significantly increase the overall cost homeowners pay and hinder building home value.

Blaming the Past Government and Economic Prospects

In their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have again blamed Biden for economic problems, such as increasing costs. Spokespeople claimed they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up Biden’s inflation.” These are unfounded and untruthful allegations. In reality, Biden left a strong economy, with inflation way down, solid expansion, and minimal joblessness. However, Trump’s policies—particularly import taxes—have created an economic mess, pushing up prices and reducing economic output.

According to an economist, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are already in recession, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. He worries that if key regions such as major economies enter a downturn, the US could slide into a broad economic slump. In downturns, people typically have reduced funds to spend, and price increases usually declines. Sadly, given the highly-touted cost initiative likely to do little to control costs, his primary method for improving living standards might end up triggering an economic contraction—a scenario that hard-pressed households cannot handle.